Cognitive Load Theory

In this chapter we will consider the two categories of knowledge introduced above that we have evolved to acquire, biologically primary and biologically secondary knowledge. How we acquire those two categories of knowledge and the consequent instructional implications will be analysed. The distinction between biologically primary and biologically secondary knowledge was suggested by Geary (2007, 2008). By distinguishing between these categories of knowledge, Geary has provided a unique base for educational psychology. He differentiates between biologically secondary knowledge that is learnable and teachable and biologically primary knowledge that is learnable but not teachable because it is usually learned without being explicitly taught. In the process, he explains many otherwise puzzling findings. Indeed, his formulation has the potential to not only change instructional design but to change our view of ourselves.
The contrast between primary and secondary knowledge constitutes the core of Geary’s treatment. We have evolved to assimilate biologically primary knowledge. In some ways, it can be seen as instinctive knowledge that we are programmed to acquire and so does not need to be taught. On the other hand, we also can assimilate biologically secondary knowledge; but because it is knowledge we have not had to deal with [......]
Note: "This download page will direct you to skip automatically advertising adf.ly. Basically when the page loads the site adf.ly with various advertisements, the add-on does go directly to the site you want, kindly be patient waiting a few seconds". Thank you ~ by Admin
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar